4.6 Article

Time-resolved pump-probe experiments at the LCLS

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 18, 期 17, 页码 17620-17630

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.18.017620

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-04ER15614]
  4. NSF [PHY-0649578]
  5. DOE-BES [DE-FG02-92ER14299]
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  7. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division of the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  8. Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT)
  9. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-92ER14299, DE-FG02-04ER15614] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Physics [0969322] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first time-resolved x-ray/optical pump-probe experiments at the SLAC Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) used a combination of feedback methods and post-analysis binning techniques to synchronize an ultrafast optical laser to the linac-based x-ray laser. Transient molecular nitrogen alignment revival features were resolved in time-dependent x-ray-induced fragmentation spectra. These alignment features were used to find the temporal overlap of the pump and probe pulses. The strong-field dissociation of x-ray generated quasi-bound molecular dications was used to establish the residual timing jitter. This analysis shows that the relative arrival time of the Ti:Sapphire laser and the x-ray pulses had a distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 120 fs. The largest contribution to the jitter noise spectrum was the locking of the laser oscillator to the reference RF of the accelerator, which suggests that simple technical improvements could reduce the jitter to better than 50 fs. (C) 2010 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据