4.6 Article

Noninvasive monitoring of cerebral blood oxygenation in ovine superior sagittal sinus with novel multi-wavelength optoacoustic system

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 7285-7294

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.17.007285

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Moody Center for Traumatic Brain & Spinal Cord Injury Research/Mission Connect of the University of Texas Medical Branch
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 EB00763]
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and Research [R01 NS044345]
  4. John Sealy Memorial Endowment Fund for Biomedical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Noninvasive monitoring of cerebral blood oxygenation with an optoacoustic technique offers advantages over current invasive and noninvasive methods. We report the results of in vivo studies in the sheep superior sagittal sinus (SSS), a large central cerebral vein. We changed blood oxygenation by increasing and decreasing the inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO(2)). Optoacoustic measurements from the SSS were performed at wavelengths of 700, 800, and 1064 nm using an optical parametric oscillator as a source of pulsed near-infrared light. Actual oxygenation of SSS blood was measured with a CO-Oximeter in blood samples drawn from the SSS through a small craniotomy. The amplitude of the optoacoustic signal induced in the SSS blood at lambda = 1064 nm closely followed the changes in blood oxygenation, at. = 800 nm was almost constant, and at. = 700 nm was changing in the opposite direction, all in accordance with the absorption spectra of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin. The optoacoustically predicted oxygenation correlated well with actual blood oxygenation in sheep SSS ( R-2 = 0.965 to 0.990). The accuracy was excellent, with a mean difference of 4.8% to 9.3% and a standard deviation of 2.8% to 4.2%. To the best of our knowledge, this paper reports for the first time accurate measurements of cerebral venous blood oxygenation validated against the gold standard CO-Oximetry method. (C) 2009 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据