4.6 Article

Cross-talk free and ultra-compact fiber optic sensor for simultaneous measurement of temperature and refractive index

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 141-149

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.18.000141

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. institute of Medical System Engineering (iMSE) in the GIST, Korea
  2. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF)
  3. Korea government (MEST) [R01-2007-000-20821-0]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2007-0056120, R01-2007-000-20821-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose and demonstrate a cross-talk free simultaneous measurement system for temperature and external refractive index (ERI) implemented by dual-cavity Fabry-Perot (FP) fiber interferometer. The sensing probe consists of two cascaded FP cavities formed with a short piece of multimode fiber (MMF) and a micro-air-gap made of hollow core fiber (HOF). The fabricated sensor head was ultra-compact; the total length of the sensing part was less than 600 mu m. Since the reflection spectrum of the composite FP structures is given by the superposition of each cavity spectrum, the spectrum measured in the wavelength domain was analyzed in the Fourier or spatial frequency domain. The experimental results showed that temperature could be determined independently from the spatial frequency shift without being affected by the ERI, while the ERI could be also measured solely by monitoring the intensity variation in the spatial frequency spectrum. The ERI and the temperature sensitivities were approximately 16 dB/RIU for the 1.33-1.45 index range, and 8.9 nm/degrees C at low temperature and 14.6 nm/degrees C at high temperature, respectively. In addition, it is also demonstrated that the proposed dual-cavity FP sensor has potential for compensating any power fluctuation that might happen in the input light source. (C) 2009 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据