4.7 Article

Speckle pattern quality assessment for digital image correlation

期刊

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
卷 51, 期 12, 页码 1368-1378

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.03.014

关键词

Speckle pattern quality; Morphological assessment; Digital image correlation (DIC); High spatial resolution

类别

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. Stanley Grey Fellowship
  3. Institute of Marine Engineering, Science Technology
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G042403/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/G042403/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To perform digital image correlation (DIC), each image is divided into groups of pixels known as subsets or interrogation cells. Larger interrogation cells allow greater strain precision but reduce the spatial resolution of the data field. As such the spatial resolution and measurement precision of DIC are limited by the resolution of the image. In the paper the relationship between the size and density of speckles within a pattern is presented, identifying that the physical properties of a pattern have a large influence on the measurement precision which can be obtained. These physical properties are often overlooked by pattern assessment criteria which focus on the global image information content. To address this, a robust morphological methodology using edge detection is devised to evaluate the physical properties of different speckle patterns with image resolutions from 23 to 705 pixels/mm. Trends predicted from the pattern property analysis are assessed against simulated deformations identifying how small changes to the application method can result in large changes in measurement precision. An example of the methodology is included to demonstrate that the pattern properties derived from the analysis can be used to indicate pattern quality and hence minimise DIC measurement errors. Experiments are described that were conducted to validate the findings of morphological assessment and the error analysis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据