4.6 Article

Ratiometric optical thermometry using deep red luminescence from T-4(2) and E-2 states of Cr3+ in ZnGa2O4 host

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 510-516

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.09.013

关键词

Thermometer; Ratiometric thermometer; Cr3+; ZnGa2O4

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [16K05934, 16H06441]
  2. Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia [GLTFY0111PR]
  3. European Regional Development Fund [TK141]
  4. Guest Professorship at Kyoto University
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [P17761]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZnGa2O4:Cr3+ is a well-known deep red (persistent) phosphor with R-lines due to the E-2 ->(4)A(2) spin-forbidden transition of Cr3+ ions between 690 and 750 nm. Recently, this system has attracted a great deal of interest for in-vivo bio-imaging. In this study, we investigated the temperature dependence of photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of ZnGa2O4:Cr3+ and the possibility of using this material for thermometry. At 80 K, the zero-phonon lines and phonon-side bands of the E-2 ->(4)A(2) transition were observed in the PL spectrum. At higher temperatures above 250 K, a broad PL band was observed at around 720 nm in addition to the sharp E-2 ->(4)A(2) luminescence. After determination of the Stokes shift energy between the PL and PL excitation spectra and the increase of broad luminescence band intensity with increasing temperature, we attribute this additional broad luminescence band to the spin-allowed T-4(2)->(4)A(2) transition of Cr3+ ions. The fluorescence intensity ratio of these emission transitions (T-4(2)->(4)A(2))/(E-2 ->(4)A(2)) shows good linearity from 270 K to 700 K in the Arrhenius plot. The activation energy needed for excitation from the E-2 state to the T-4(2) state of Cr3+ was estimated to be 1744 cm(-1). Based on our results, we suggest that the ZnGa2O4:Cr3+ system can work well as a ratiometric thermometer with a high relative sensitivity of 2.8 %K-1 (at 310 K) in a wide temperature range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据