4.6 Article

Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema with Prompt versus Deferred Laser Treatment Three-Year Randomized Trial Results

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 119, 期 11, 页码 2312-2318

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.022

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institute
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [EY14231, EY14229, EY18817]
  3. Genentech
  4. Office of Research Administration
  5. Abbott Medical Optics
  6. Allergan
  7. Bausch Lomb
  8. Bristol-Meyer-Squibb
  9. Carl Zeiss Meditec
  10. EMMES Corporation
  11. ForSight Labs
  12. LLC Genentech
  13. Genzyme Corporation
  14. Lumenis
  15. Notal Vision
  16. Novartis
  17. Regeneron

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To report the 3-year follow-up results within a previously reported randomized trial evaluating prompt versus deferred (for >= 24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment in eyes treated with intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME). Design: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Participants: Three hundred sixty-one participants with visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320 (approximate Snellen equivalent) and DME involving the fovea. Methods: Ranibizumab every 4 weeks until no longer improving (with resumption if worsening) and random assignment to prompt or deferred (>= 24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment. Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected visual acuity and safety at the 156-week (3-year) visit. Results: The estimated mean change in visual acuity letter score from baseline through the 3-year visit was 2.9 letters more (9.7 vs. 6.8 letters; mean difference, 2.9 letters; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-5.4 letters; P = 0.02) in the deferral group compared with the prompt laser treatment group. In the prompt laser treatment group and deferral group, respectively, the percentage of eyes with a >= 10-letter gain/loss was 42% and 56% (P = 0.02), whereas the respective percentage of eyes with a >= 10-letter gain/loss was 10% and 5% (P = 0.12). Up to the 3-year visit, the median numbers of injections were 12 and 15 in the prompt and deferral groups, respectively (P = 0.007), including 1 and 2 injections, respectively, from the 2-year up to the 3-year visit. At the 3-year visit, the percentages of eyes with central subfield thickness of 250 mu m or more on time-domain optical coherence tomography were 36% in both groups (P = 0.90). In the deferral group, 54% did not receive laser treatment during the trial. Systemic adverse events seemed to be similar in the 2 groups. Conclusions: These 3-year results suggest that focal/grid laser treatment at the initiation of intravitreal ranibizumab is no better, and possibly worse, for vision outcomes than deferring laser treatment for 24 weeks or more in eyes with DME involving the fovea and with vision impairment. Some of the observed differences in visual acuity at 3 years may be related to fewer cumulative ranibizumab injections during follow-up in the prompt laser treatment group. Follow-up through 5 years continues. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2312-2318 (C) 2012 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据