4.6 Article

Economic Considerations of Macular Edema Therapies

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 118, 期 9, 页码 1827-1833

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.034

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30-EY014801]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To relate costs and treatment benefits for diabetic macular edema (DME), branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Design: A model of resource use, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness and utility. Participants: None. Methods: Results from published clinical trials (index studies) of laser, intravitreal corticosteroids, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, and vitrectomy trials were used to ascertain visual benefit and clinical protocols. Calculations followed from the costs of 1 year of treatment for each treatment modality and the visual benefits as ascertained. Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity (VA) saved, cost of therapy, cost per line saved, cost per line-year saved, and costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results: The lines saved for DME (0.26-2.02), BRVO (0.74-4.92), and CRVO (1.2-3.75) yielded calculations of costs/line of saved VA for DME ($1329-$11,609), BRVO ($494-$13,039), and CRVO ($704-$7611); costs/line-year for DME ($60-$561), BRVO ($25-$754), and CRVO ($45-$473); and costs/QALY ($824 to $25,566). Conclusions: Relative costs and benefits should be considered in perspective when applying and developing treatment strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据