4.6 Article

Two-Year Outcomes of the Ranibizumab for Edema of the mAcula in Diabetes (READ-2) Study

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 117, 期 11, 页码 2146-2151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. Genentech
  3. Regeneron
  4. Schering Plough
  5. Pfizer
  6. Alimera
  7. Ophthotech
  8. Allergan
  9. Macusight
  10. L Path
  11. GSK
  12. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, New York
  13. Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
  14. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine the long-term effects of ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Design: Prospective, randomized, interventional, multicenter clinical trial. Participants: One hundred twenty-six patients with DME. Methods: Subjects were randomized 1: 1: 1 to receive 0.5 mg RBZ at baseline and months 1, 3, and 5 (group 1), focal or grid laser photocoagulation at baseline and month 3 if needed (group 2), or a combination of 0.5 mg RBZ and focal or grid laser at baseline and month 3 (group 3). Starting at month 6, if retreatment criteria were met, all subjects could be treated with RBZ. Main Outcome Measures: The mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 24. Results: After the primary end point at month 6, most patients in all groups were treated only with RBZ, and the mean number of injections was 5.3, 4.4, and 2.9 during the 18-month follow-up period in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For the 33 patients in group 1, 34 patients in group 2, and 34 patients in group 3 who remained in the study through 24 months, the mean improvement in BCVA was 7.4, 0.5, and 3.8 letters at the 6-month primary end point, compared with 7.7, 5.1, and 6.8 letters at month 24, and the percentage of patients who gained 3 lines or more of BCVA was 21, 0, and 6 at month 6, compared with 24, 18, and 26 at month 24. The percentage of patients with 20/40 or better Snellen equivalent at month 24 was 45% in group 1, 44% in group 2, and 35% in group 3. Mean foveal thickness (FTH), defined as center subfield thickness, at month 24 was 340 mu m, 286 mu m, and 258 mu m for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and the percentage of patients with center subfield thickness of 250 mu m or less was 36%, 47%, and 68%, respectively. Conclusions: Intraocular injections of RBZ provided benefit for patients with DME for at least 2 years, and when combined with focal or grid laser treatments, the amount of residual edema was reduced, as were the frequency of injections needed to control edema. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 2146-2151 (C) 2010 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据