4.6 Article

Ocular Biometry and Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 117, 期 9, 页码 1713-1719

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.035

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institute and National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, New York
  3. [EY11753]
  4. [EY03040]
  5. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [U10EY011753, P30EY003040] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To examine the associations among myopic refractive error (MRE), corneal power (CP), axial length (AL), and the prevalence of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in an adult Latino population. Design: Population-based, cross-sectional epidemiologic study. Participants: A total of 5927 Latinos aged 40 years and older in the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study (LALES). Methods: Myopic refractive error was defined as a non-cycloplegic sphero-cylindrical refractive error of <= -1 diopter (D). Axial length was measured by A-scan ultrasound. Corneal power was measured using a Humphrey auto-refractor. Open-angle glaucoma was diagnosed by a combination of optic nerve and visual field changes. Pseudophakic and aphakic eyes were excluded from the analysis. The associations among MRE, AL, CP, and the prevalence of OAG were calculated using a logistic regression model, adjusting for age, gender, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, diabetes mellitus, family history of glaucoma, and lens nuclear opacification (NO). Main Outcome Measures: Odds ratios (OR) for the prevalence of OAG. Results: After adjusting for covariates, persons with greater MRE (OR 1.82; confidence interval [CI], 1.20-2.77; P = 0.005), longer AL (OR 1.25; CI, 1.03-1.50; P = 0.02), and flatter corneas (OR 1.21; CI, 1.08-1.35; P = 0.0007) were associated with a higher prevalence of OAG when compared with those with emmetropic refractive error, shorter AL, and steeper corneas. Conclusions: Persons with an MRE, flatter corneas, and longer ALs should be considered to be at higher risk of having OAG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据