4.1 Article

Effect of Tooth Surface Preparation on the Bonding of Self-Etching Primer Adhesives

期刊

OPERATIVE DENTISTRY
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 137-149

出版社

OPERATIVE DENTISTRY INC
DOI: 10.2341/11-172-L

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dentsply Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to determine the bonding effectiveness of four self-etching primer adhesives after various tooth preparation protocols. Enamel/dentin specimens were prepared from 84 permanent molars, divided into three enamel preparation groups (silicon carbide paper [SiC]; erbium, chromium:yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet [Er,Cr:YSGG] laser [EL] and diamond bur [DB]) and five dentin preparation groups (SiC, EL, DB, steel [SB], and ceramic burs [CBs]). In each group, specimens were equally divided into four subgroups and were bonded using Clearfil SE Bond (CSE, Kuraray), Xeno IV (XE, Dentsply), Tokuyama Bond Force (TX, Tokuyama) and Filtek Silorane System Adhesive (FS, 3M ESPE), as well as a hybrid resin composite (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic, Kuraray) for CSE, XE, and TX, and Filtek Posterior Restorative (3M ESPE) for FS). After 24 hours of water storage at 37 degrees C, microshear bond strength (mu SBS) testing was carried out. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA)-Tukey test at alpha=0.05 and bond failure modes assessed. Representative debonded specimens were prepared and examined under the scanning electron microscope (SEM). All adhesives exhibited no significant differences in mu SBS on enamel and dentin under the clinical cavity preparation protocols, except for TX on dentin. SEM revealed areas of altered subsurface enamel/dentin following EL ablation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据