4.4 Article

Library marketing via social media: The relationships between Facebook content and user engagement in public libraries

期刊

ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 940-955

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/OIR-10-2017-0288

关键词

Online marketing; Social media; Public library; Social media marketing; User engagement

资金

  1. Speed Dating For Researchers-V (SDR-V) Collaborative Grant, College of Communication and Information, University of Kentucky

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold: to explore what kinds of social media content public libraries create to communicate with users online, and to examine the relationships between social media content types and corresponding levels of user engagement. Design/methodology/approach The sample comprises 4,637 Facebook posts collected from 151 public libraries across the USA. The authors identified ten types of Facebook posts based on the open coding, and calculated the degrees of user engagement for each type of Facebook post, represented by the numbers of likes, shares and comments. Also, The authors examined the effects of the inclusions of images or video clips on user engagement. Findings The authors observed that the most frequent type of post was related to announcing upcoming events held in libraries. This study also found that posts about community news or emotionally inspiring messages elicited much engagement from users. Posts having an image or images tend to receive more user engagement. Practical implications Based on the findings of this study, the authors discussed practical strategies for public libraries to effectively use social media to better facilitate user engagement. Originality/value This study is one of a few attempts that examine the relationships between the types of social media content and the degrees of user engagement in public library environments. Also, the authors have proposed a coding scheme useful to analyze social media content in the context of public libraries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据