4.4 Article

Exploring the h-index at the institutional level: A practical application in world university rankings

期刊

ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 534-547

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED
DOI: 10.1108/14684521211254059

关键词

H-index; Research evaluation; Bibliometrics; University rankings; Research; Organizational performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to evaluate the scientific performance of universities by extending the application of the h-index from the-individual to the institutional level. A ranking of the world's top universities based on their h-index scores was produced. The geographic distribution of the highly ranked universities by continent and by country was also analysed. Design/approach/methodology - This study uses bibliometric analysis to rank the universities. In order to calculate their h-index the numbers of papers and citations in each university were gathered from Web of Science, including the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index. Authority control dealing with variations in university names ensured the accuracy of each university's number of published journal papers and the subsequent statistics of their citations. Findings - It was found that a high correlation exists between the h-index ranking generated in this study and that produced by Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The results confirm the validity of the h-index in the assessment of research performance at the university level. Originality/value - The h-index has been used to evaluate research performance at the institutional level in several recent studies; however these studies evaluated institutions' performance only in certain disciplines or in a single country. This paper measures the research performance of universities all over the world, and the applicability of the h-index at the institutional level was validated by calculating the correlation between the ranking result of the h-index and the ranking by the Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据