4.4 Article

Factors Exacerbating Peripheral Neuropathy Induced by Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 179-185

出版社

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/096504012X13522227232192

关键词

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin +/- bevacizumab; Peripheral neuropathy; Non-small cell lung cancer; Cox proportional hazard analysis; Pack-year; Creatinine clearance

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

No established supportive therapy to prevent and treat chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) is available. Minimizing the severity of PN is therefore critical in clinical use. We aimed to determine when and how often PN occurs in association with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC therapy), a regimen used to treat non-small cell lung cancer, and factors that exacerbate this condition. Patients who received PC therapy for non-small cell lung cancer at the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, between May 20, 2009, and November 30, 2010, were included. PN was evaluated by the study pharmacist using specific questions based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0. Univariate analysis was used to compare a group with no, Grade 1, or Grade 2 PN (non-serious) and a group with Grade 3 PN (serious). Analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazard model with patient characteristics having p <= 0.20 when assessed as independent variables. Of 50 patients, 38 (76.0%) developed PN by day 6 of the first course of anticancer treatment. Grade 3 PN had an incidence of 25.0% in the fourth course. In multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model, pack-year [hazard ratio = 1.029; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.009-1.050, p = 0.005] and creatinine clearance (hazard ratio = 0.957; 95% CI: 0.920-0.996, p = 0.031) were significant factors. A high pack-year and a low creatinine clearance exacerbated PN in patients treated with PC. PN must be carefully evaluated in patients with exacerbating factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据