4.5 Article

Overexpression of goosecoid homeobox is associated with chemoresistance and poor prognosis in ovarian carcinoma

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 189-198

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2014.3203

关键词

ovarian carcinoma; chemoresistance; PCR array; qRT-PCR; immunohistochemistry

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2012-R1A1B3004095]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal cancer among all gynecological malignancies due to recurrence through chemoresistance. The aim of the present study was to identify new biomarkers to predict chemoresistance and prognosis in ovarian carcinomas. The mRNA expression by qRT-PCR was examined in 60 ovarian serous carcinomas for selected genes from the screening by PCR array focusing on apoptosis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer pathways. The clinical impact was assessed by analyzing the correlation between gene expression and clinicopathological variables. Further validation with immunohistochemistry was performed with 75 cases of serous carcinomas. The chemoresistance was significantly associated with high expression of FOS, GSC, SNAIL TERT and TNFRSF10D, and low expression of CDKN1A, TNFRSF10A, TNFRSF10C and TRAF1 (P<0.05, t-test). Low expression of TRAF1 and high expression of E2F1, FOS, TERT and GSC were significantly associated with advanced clinical stage (P<0.05, chi(2)-test). Lymph node metastasis was significantly associated with high expression of GSC. The upregulation group of TERT, GSC, NOTCH1 and SNAI1 and downregulation group of TRAF1 were significantly associated with poor overall survival (P<0.05, log-rank test). On further validation with immunohistochemistry, overexpression of goosecoid homeobox (GSC) was associated with poor overall survival. The results suggest that GSC is the most potential biomarker of drug response and poor prognosis in ovarian serous carcinomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据