4.5 Article

Copper induces cellular senescence in human glioblastoma multiforme cells through downregulation of Bmi-1

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 1805-1810

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2013.2333

关键词

glioblastoma; copper metal; senescence; Bmi-1

类别

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in the University [NECT-060611]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [81071008, 81171177]
  3. 211 Project-phase III of Zhengzhou University
  4. Basic and Clinical Research of Stem Cells
  5. Excellent Youth Foundation of Henan Scientific Committee [114100510005]
  6. Young Excellent Teachers in University Funded Projects of Henan Province
  7. Bureau of Science and Technology Development Project from Henan Province [200902310250]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most human tumor cells, including glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells, have aberrant control of cell aging and apoptosis. Subcytotoxic concentrations of oxidative or stress-causing agents, such as hydrogen peroxide, may induce human cell senescence. Thus, induction of tumor cells into premature senescence may provide a useful in vitro model for developing novel therapeutic strategy to combat tumors. In the present study, we assessed the molecular mechanism(s) underlying senescence in GBM cells induced by copper sulfate. Following pretreatment with subcytotoxic concentrations of copper sulfate, U87-MG tumor cells showed typical aging characteristics, including reduced cell proliferation, cell enlargement, increased level of senescence-associated (beta-galactosidase (SA beta-gal) activity, and overexpression of several senescence-associated genes, p16, p21, transforming Growth factor (beta-1 (TGF-beta 1), insulin growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) and apolipoprotein J (ApoJ). We further demonstrated that the Bmi-1 pathway was downregulated in GBM cells in parallel with the induced senescence. The present study for the first time demonstrates the ability of copper to induce GBM cell senescence by downregulating Bmi-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据