4.5 Article

OCT4 is epigenetically regulated by DNA hypomethylation of promoter and exon in primary gliomas

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 201-206

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2013.2456

关键词

glioma; OCT4; hypomethylation

类别

资金

  1. Youth Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81201975]
  2. Youth Fund of the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012224]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China Ministry of Health [2010-2-025]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Department of Health [H201124]
  5. Six Major Human Resources Project of Jiangsu Province [2011-WS-065, 2010-WS-038]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Colleges and Universities Grant [11KJB320010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioma is the leading cause of tumor-related mortality in the central nervous system. There is increasing evidence that the self-renewal capacity of cancer cells is critical for the initiation, growth and recurrence of tumors. OCT4 is a transcription factor that plays a key role in regulating the self-renewal ability of embryonic stem cells. DNA methylation is involved in the regulation of OCT4 expression during the development and differentiation of embryonic stem cells and neural stem cells. In the present study, we reported that OCT4 was highly expressed in primary gliomas and its expression levels increased in parallel with pathological grades. BSP analysis showed that the methylation levels of OCT4 gene promoter and exon were significantly reduced in comparison with the normal group and were negatively correlated with OCT4 gene expression in primary gliomas. In vitro, OCT4 gene expression was upregulated following treatment by a demethylation reagent in glioma cell lines. Our findings suggest that OCT4 is epigenetically regulated by DNA hypomethylation in primary gliomas, which may provide evidence for the role of DNA methylation in tumor and may present a new direction for developing more powerful strategies to treat glioma in the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据