4.5 Article

The prognostic value of cadherin switch in bladder cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 1125-1132

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or_00000741

关键词

bladder cancer; cadherin switch; E-cadherin; N-cadherin; P-cadherin; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. National Federal Ministry of Education and Research [0313659B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Loss of E-cadherin expression and vain of N-cadherin expression ('cadherin switch') is shown to he characteristic in epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), a mechanism associated with cancer progression. Furthermore the prognostic role of P-cadherin in different cancers is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of 'cadherin switch' oil the gene expression level in bladder cancer. Frozen tissue samples of 181 bladder cancer patients and 7 control individuals were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and COx univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the prognostic relevance of gene expression of E-, N- and P-cadherin. COx univariate analysis revealed that the decrease of E-cadherin and the gain of N-cadherin gene expression are risk factors for cancer-related death (P=0.087, P=0.005. respectively). Fourteen percent (13/92) of muscle-invasive bladder cancers were N-cadherin-negative. These patients had a significantly poorer prognosis than those with N-cadherin-positive muscle-invasive tumors (P=0.024). P-cadherin gene expression proved to he a significant independent prognostic factor for both cancer-specific and recurrence-free Survival (P=0.011, P=0.036). The characteristic 'cadherin switch' between low- and high-stage tumors that we observed and the prognostic significance of E-, N- and P-cadherin suggests the importance of these markers in bladder cancer progression. The poor patient prognosis in N-cadherin-negative muscle-invasive tumors indicates an alternative, N-cadherin-independent way in bladder cancer progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据