4.4 Article

Correlations between the Recurrence Patterns and Sizes of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes before and after Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Lower Rectal Cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGY
卷 96, 期 1, 页码 33-43

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000492493

关键词

Rectal cancer; Lateral pelvic lymph node; Chemoradiotherapy; Lung metastasis; Liver metastasis

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16K07143, 16K07161, 17K10620, 17K10621, 17K10623, 18K07194]
  2. Project for Cancer Research and Therapeutic Evolution (P-CREATE) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [18cm0106502h0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Factors that predict rectal cancer metastasis to the lungs remain undefined. We investigated whether the lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) sizes before and after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) correlate with lung metastasis after surgery for lower rectal cancer. Methods: Two hundred and forty patients with lower rectal cancer who received preoperative CRT and curative surgery between 2003 and 2017 were examined. Computed tomography-measured LPN sizes before and after CRT were retrospectively determined by 1 colorectal surgeon who was blinded to the patients' clinical and pathological outcomes. Results: The 5-year cumulative lung metastasis rates were 15.2%. The mean LPN sizes in patients who developed lung metastasis were larger than those in patients who did not (pre-CRT: 8.7 vs. 6.3 mm, p = 0.003; post-CRT: 6.8 vs. 4.5 mm, p = 0.001). The cumulative lung metastasis rate in patients with large LPNs was higher than in those with small LPNs both before and after CRT. On multivariate analysis, lung metastasis was independently correlated with the LPN size only after CRT (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.58), together with the ypT stage (HR: 2.96) and the tumor location (HR: 0.38). Conclusions: LPN size after CRT is strongly predictive of postoperative lung metastasis in patients with lower rectal cancer. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据