4.4 Article

Expression of Estrogen Receptor Beta and Phosphorylation of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Serine 167 Correlate with Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors

期刊

ONCOLOGY
卷 79, 期 1-2, 页码 55-61

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000319540

关键词

Aromatase inhibitor; Breast cancer; Estrogen receptor-alpha; Estrogen receptor-beta; Prognostic factor

类别

资金

  1. Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aromatase inhibitor (AI) is widely used as an endocrine treatment in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptorpositive breast cancer. To identify useful prognostic factors for patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with AI therapy, we investigated the association between several hormone receptor-related factors and prognosis. The expressions of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER alpha), ER beta, progesterone receptor, the phosphorylation of ER alpha serine 118 (Ser118) and ER alpha Ser167 were examined using immunohistochemical techniques for the primary tumors of 41 patients with metastatic breast cancer who received first-line AI therapy after relapse. To assess the associations of protein expression and phosphorylation levels with progression-free survival (PFS), the levels of each factor were categorized into low and high values at optimal cutoff points. In univariate analysis, high ER alpha expression and high ER alpha Ser167 phosphorylation correlated with longer PFS (p = 0.016 and 0.013, respectively). In multivariate analysis, low ER beta expression and high ER alpha Ser167 phosphorylation correlated with longer PFS (p = 0.031 and 0.004, respectively). Patients with both low ER beta expression and high ER alpha Ser167 phosphorylation had longer PFS than the others (p = 0.0107). These data suggest that the expression of ER beta and phosphorylation of ER alpha Ser167 may be useful prognostic factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer who received first-line AI therapy. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据