4.4 Article

CD147, MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-9 Protein Expression as Significant Prognostic Factors in Human Prostate Cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGY
卷 75, 期 3-4, 页码 230-236

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000163852

关键词

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; CD147; Clinical pathology; MMPs; Prostate cancer

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of the Guangdong Province [04003650]
  2. Science and Technology of Guangzhou city [200323-E4053]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Project of China [2006AA02A245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: CD147 and MMPs have been demonstrated to be involved in tumor invasion and angiogenesis. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological significance of CD147, MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in human prostate cancer (PCa) and to evaluate their involvement in the progression of PCa. Methods: CD147, MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression was assessed in paraffin-embedded specimens collected from 62 cases of PCa and 15 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by immunohistochemistry. Spearman's correlation was applied to determine possible relationships between CD147, MMP-1, MMP- 2 and MMP- 9 expression and PCa. The association of CD147 and MMP-2 protein expression with the clinicopathological characteristics and the prognosis of PCa was subsequently assessed. Results: CD147 was expressed in 51/62 (82.3%) PCa patients and in 2/15 (13.3%) BPH cases. MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP- 9 expression was significantly higher in PCa tissue than in BPH tissue. Using Spearman analysis, a significant positive correlation between CD147 and MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression was found (p < 0.05). CD147 and MMP-2 expression was correlated with TMN grade and Gleason score. Patients with concurrent expression of CD147+ and MMP-2+ had the lowest survival (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The results suggest that concurrent expression of CD147 and MMP may be an important characteristic of PCa which may help in the prediction of PCa progression. Copyright (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据