4.7 Article

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Patients with Terminal Cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGIST
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 1337-1345

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0041

关键词

Cancer; Anxiety; Cognitive behavior therapy; Quality of life

类别

资金

  1. Forrest Pharmaceuticals
  2. Allergan
  3. Ameritox
  4. Boston Scientific
  5. Covidien Mallinckrodt Inc.
  6. Endo Pharmaceuticals
  7. Forest Labs
  8. K-Pax Pharmaceuticals
  9. Medtronics
  10. Otsuka Pharma
  11. ProStrakan
  12. Purdue Pharma
  13. Salix
  14. St. Jude Medical
  15. National Cancer Institute [R03CA128478]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction. Patients with terminal cancer often experience marked anxiety that is associated with poor quality of life. Although cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based treatment for anxiety disorders, the approach needs to be adapted to address realistic concerns related to having cancer, such as worries about disease progression, disability, and death. In this pilot randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials. gov identifier NCT00706290), we examined the feasibility and potential efficacy of brief CBT to reduce anxiety in patients with terminal cancer. Methods. We adapted CBT by developing treatment modules targeting skills for relaxation, coping with cancer worries, and activity pacing. Adults with incurable malignancies and elevated anxiety based on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) were randomly assigned to individual CBT or a waitlist control group. Primary outcomes included the number of completed CBT visits and the change in HAM-A scores from baseline to 8-week follow-up per a treatment-blind evaluator. The feasibility criterion was 75% adherence to the intervention. Results. We randomized 40 patients with terminal cancers to CBT (n = 20) or waitlist control (n = 20) groups; 70% completed posttreatment assessments. Most patients who received CBT (80%) participated in at least five of the required six therapy sessions. Analysis of covariance models, adjusted for baseline scores, showed that those assigned to CBT had greater improvements in HAM-A scores compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of -5.41 (95% confidence interval: -10.78 to -0.04) and a large effect size for the intervention (Cohen's d = 0.80). Conclusion. Providing brief CBT tailored to the concerns of patients with terminal cancer was not only feasible but also led to significant improvements in anxiety. The Oncologist 2012; 17: 1337-1345

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据