4.7 Article

Inflammatory Breast Cancer: What We Know and What We Need to Learn

期刊

ONCOLOGIST
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 891-899

出版社

ALPHAMED PRESS
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0039

关键词

Inflammatory breast cancer; Systemic therapy; Targeted therapy

类别

资金

  1. Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic
  2. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01-CA123318, CA016672]
  4. State of Texas Rare and Aggressive Breast Cancer Research Program Grant
  5. Novartis
  6. Amgen
  7. Celgene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. We review the current status of multidisciplinary care for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and discuss what further research is needed to advance the care of patients with this disease. Design. We performed a comprehensive review of the English-language literature on IBC through computerized literature searches. Results. Significant advances in imaging, including digital mammography, high-resolution ultrasonography with Doppler capabilities, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography, have improved the diagnosis and staging of IBC. There are currently no established molecular criteria for distinguishing IBC from noninflammatory breast cancer. Such criteria would be helpful for the diagnosis and development of novel targeted therapies. Combinations of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy have led to an improved prognosis; however, the overall 5-year survival rate for patients with IBC remains very low (similar to 30%). Sentinel lymph node biopsy and skin-sparing mastectomy are not recommended for patients with IBC. Conclusion. Optimal management of IBC requires close coordination among medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists, as well as radiologists and pathologists. There is a need to identify molecular changes that define the pathogenesis of IBC to enable eradication of IBC with the use of IBC-specific targeted therapies. The Oncologist 2012;17: 891-899

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据