4.7 Article

Plasma Soluble VEGFR-1 Is a Potential Dual Biomarker of Response and Toxicity for Bevacizumab with Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGIST
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 577-583

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0029

关键词

Bevacizumab; sVEGFR-1; Biomarker; Rectal cancer; Chemoradiation; Toxicity

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R21-CA99237, P01-CA80124, R01-CA115767, R01-CA85140, R01-CA126642]
  2. Federal Share/NCI Proton Beam Program Income
  3. National Foundation for Cancer Research
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA115767, P01CA080124, R01CA085140, R21CA099237, T32CA073479, R01CA126642] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explored plasma and urinary concentrations of two members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family and their receptors as potential response and toxicity biomarkers of bevacizumab with neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with localized rectal cancer. The concentrations of VEGF, placental growth factor (PlGF), soluble VEGF receptor 1 (sVEGFR-1), and sVEGFR-2 were measured in plasma and urine at baseline and during treatment. Pretreatment values and changes over time were analyzed as potential biomarkers of pathological response to treatment as well as for acute toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated prospectively in 2002-2008 with neoadjuvant bevacizumab, 5-fluorouracil, radiation therapy, and surgery in a phase I/II trial. Of all biomarkers, pretreatment plasma sVEGFR-1-an endogenous blocker of VEGF and PlGF, and a factor linked with vascular normalization-was associated with both primary tumor regression and the development of adverse events after neoadjuvant bevacizumab and chemoradiation. Based on the findings in this exploratory study, we propose that plasma sVEGFR-1 should be further studied as a potential biomarker to stratify patients in future studies of bevacizumab and/or cytotoxics in the neoadjuvant setting. The Oncologist 2010;15:577-583

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据