4.7 Article

New therapeutic directions for advanced pancreatic cancer: Targeting the epidermal growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways

期刊

ONCOLOGIST
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 289-298

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0134

关键词

pancreatic cancer; erlotinib; cetuximab; bevacizumab; sorafenib; chemotherapy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In advanced pancreatic cancer, single- agent gemcitabine became the standard therapy approximately 10 years ago. Subsequently, combinations of gemcitabine with fluorouracil, cisplatin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, or pemetrexed produced no clear survival benefit. Among the newer approaches, targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor ( HER- 1/ EGFR) shows promise. The U. S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved erlotinib ( a HER- 1/ EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) combined with gemcitabine for the first- line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. This combination showed a statistically significant survival benefit over gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic disease ( the median overall survival time was 6.24 months versus 5.91 months; hazard ratio, 0.82; p =.038); however, the clinical significance of this survival difference has been questioned. Additionally, a large phase III trial where the addition of cetuximab ( an anti - HER- 1/ EGFR monoclonal antibody [ mAb]) to gemcitabine failed to result in a longer overall survival time than with gemcitabine alone has been reported. Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor ( VEGF) with bevacizumab ( a recombinant, humanized IgG(1) mAb that binds to VEGF) in combination with gemcitabine was investigated in a phase II trial, with promising outcomes that were unfortunately not supported by a subsequent phase III study. While the future treatment of pancreatic cancer may be influenced by the potential of certain biomarkers to predict better response to molecular- targeted therapies, allowing individualization of patient therapy, there are currently no clear candidates, and this remains an interesting area for further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据