4.8 Article

c-Myc and Her2 cooperate to drive a stem-like phenotype with poor prognosis in breast cancer

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 33, 期 30, 页码 3992-4002

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.368

关键词

Her2; ERBB2; Myc; cancer stem cell; transcriptomics; oncogene cooperation

资金

  1. International Postgraduate Research Scholarship (IPRS)
  2. Beth Yarrow Memorial Award in Medical Science
  3. Victoria Taylor, Sydney Breast Cancer Foundation
  4. CCNSW
  5. Colin Biggers & Paisley, Sydney
  6. Early Career Fellowship from the National Breast Cancer Foundation Australia
  7. Cancer Institute NSW Clinical Research Fellowship [10-CRF 1-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HER2 (ERBB2) and MYC genes are commonly amplified in breast cancer, yet little is known about their molecular and clinical interaction. Using a novel chimeric mammary transgenic approach and in vitro models, we demonstrate markedly increased self-renewal and tumour-propagating capability of cells transformed with Her2 and c-Myc. Coexpression of both oncoproteins in cultured cells led to the activation of a c-Myc transcriptional signature and acquisition of a self-renewing phenotype independent of an epithelial-mesenchymal transition programme or regulation of conventional cancer stem cell markers. Instead, Her2 and c-Myc cooperated to induce the expression of lipoprotein lipase, which was required for proliferation and self-renewal in vitro. HER2 and MYC were frequently coamplified in breast cancer, associated with aggressive clinical behaviour and poor outcome. Lastly, we show that in HER2(+) breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (but not targeted anti-Her2 therapy), MYC amplification is associated with a poor outcome. These findings demonstrate the importance of molecular and cellular context in oncogenic transformation and acquisition of a malignant stem-like phenotype and have diagnostic and therapeutic consequences for the clinical management of HER2(+) breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据