4.8 Article

Essential roles of Crk and CrkL in fibroblast structure and motility

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 33, 期 43, 页码 5121-5132

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.453

关键词

Crk; CrkL; focal adhesion; actin; cytoskeleton; motility

资金

  1. Pennsylvania Department of Health Cure Formulary grant (SAP) [4100047628]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytosolic proteins containing SH2 and SH3 domains, such as Crk and Crk-like (CrkL), are broadly expressed adapters that interact with a variety of proteins to fulfill key roles in signal transduction pathways triggered by activation of receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinases. Crk and CrkL are similar to each other in structure and biochemical function, although they provide both distinct, as well as overlapping, biological roles during development. We developed a systematic approach to investigate Crk family functions at the cellular level by generating a conditional knock-out system for ablation of Crk and CrkL in cultured fibroblasts. The loss of both Crk and CrkL from fibroblasts resulted in reduced cell surface area and adoption of a rounded, refractile cellular phenotype. These morphological alterations were accompanied by a decrease in focal adhesion sites, reduced actin stress fibers and a collapse of microtubule structures. In addition, cells exhibited decreases in spontaneous motility and wound-healing behavior. Reduced p130Cas phosphorylation and actin levels closely followed the loss of Crk and CrkL, and stabilization of polymerized actin by jasplakinolide suppressed the morphological conversion. Ablation of Crk or CrkL alone conferred a much more modest phenotype suggesting that Crk and CrkL have overlapping functions that are critical for maintaining cell structure. The morphological alterations could be partially rescued by reintroduction of CrkII, and, to a lesser extent, CrkL. Taken together, our results suggest that Crk and CrkL have critical roles in cell structure and motility by maintaining cytoskeletal integrity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据