4.8 Review

Targeting metabolism for cancer treatment and prevention: metformin, an old drug with multi-faceted effects

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 1475-1487

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2012.181

关键词

metformin; AMPK; mTORC; energetic metabolism; cancer treatment; chemoprevention

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca [DO11/002]
  2. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [R10/029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the complexity of cancer and of the underlying regulatory networks provides a new paradigm that tackles cancer development and treatment through a system biology approach, contemporarily acting on various intersecting pathways. Cancer cell metabolism is an old pathogenetic issue that has recently gained new interest as target for therapeutic approaches. More than 70 years ago, Warburg discovered that malignant cells generally have altered metabolism with high rates of glucose uptake and increased glycolysis, even under aerobic condition. Observational studies have provided evidence that impaired metabolism, obesity, hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia may have a role in cancer development, progression and prognosis, and actually diabetic and obese patients have increased cancer risk. On the other hand, caloric restriction has been shown to prolong life span and reduce cancer incidence in several animal models, having an impact on different metabolic pathways. Metformin, an antidiabetic drug widely used for over 40 years, mimics caloric restriction acting on cell metabolism at multiple levels, reducing all energy-consuming processes in the cells, including cell proliferation. By overviewing molecular mechanisms of action, epidemiological evidences, experimental data in tumor models and early clinical study results, this review provides information supporting the promising use of metformin in cancer prevention and treatment. Oncogene (2013) 32, 1475-1487; doi:10.1038/onc.2012.181; published online 4 June 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据