4.8 Article

Analysis of Rho GTPase expression in T-ALL identifies RhoU as a target for Notch involved in T-ALL cell migration

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 198-208

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2012.42

关键词

Rho GTPases; acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; Notch1; RhoU; cell migration; cytoskeleton

资金

  1. Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research UK
  2. Cancer Research UK
  3. King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence
  4. Department of Health via National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  5. King's College London
  6. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  7. Cancer Research UK [15961] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NOTCH1 is frequently mutated in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL), and can stimulate T-ALL cell survival and proliferation. Here we explore the hypothesis that Notch1 also alters T-ALL cell migration. Rho GTPases are well known to regulate cell adhesion and migration. We have analysed the expression levels of Rho GTPases in primary T-ALL samples compared with normal T cells by quantitative PCR. We found that 5 of the 20 human Rho genes are highly and consistently upregulated in T-ALL, and 3 further Rho genes are expressed in T-ALL but not detectable in normal T cells. Of these, RHOU expression is highly correlated with the expression of the Notch1 target DELTEX-1. Inhibition of Notch1 signalling with a gamma-secretase inhibitor (GSI) or Notch1 RNA interference reduced RhoU expression in T-ALL cells, whereas constitutively active Notch1 increased RhoU expression. In addition, Notch1 or RhoU depletion, or GSI treatment, inhibits T-ALL cell adhesion, migration and chemotaxis. These results indicate that NOTCH1 mutation stimulates T-ALL cell migration through RhoU upregulation that could contribute to the leukaemia cell dissemination. Oncogene (2013) 32, 198-208; doi:10.1038/onc.2012.42; published online 20 February 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据