4.8 Article

miR-135a contributes to paclitaxel resistance in tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 30, 期 43, 页码 4386-4398

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.148

关键词

paclitaxel resistance; miRNA-135a; APC; carcinoma

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Kendle
  3. KWF Cancer Foundation
  4. Stichting Fonds Catherine van Tussenbroek
  5. US Department of Defense

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer cell resistance to paclitaxel continues to be a major clinical problem. In this study, we utilized microRNA (miRNA) arrays to screen for differentially expressed miRNAs in paclitaxel-resistant cell lines established in vitro. We observed concordant upregulation of miR-135a in paclitaxel-resistant cell lines representing three human malignancies. Subsequently, the role of miRNA-135a was evaluated in an in vivo model of paclitaxel resistance. In this model, mice were inoculated subcutaneously with a non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line and treated with paclitaxel for a prolonged period. In paclitaxel-resistant cell lines, established either in vitro or in vivo, blockage of miR-135a sensitized resistant cell lines to paclitaxel-induced cell death. We further demonstrated a correlation between paclitaxel response and miR-135a expression in paclitaxel-resistant subclones that were established in vivo. The paclitaxel-resistant phenotype of these subclones was maintained upon retransplantation in new mice, as shown by decreased tumor response upon paclitaxel treatment compared with controls. Upregulation of miR-135a was associated with reduced expression of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene (APC). APC knockdown increased paclitaxel resistance in parental cell lines. Our results indicate that paclitaxel resistance is associated with upregulation of miR-135a, both in vitro and in vivo, and is in part determined by miR-135a-mediated downregulation of APC. Oncogene (2011) 30, 4386-4398; doi:10.1038/onc.2011.148; published online 9 May 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据