4.8 Article

Transgenic IGF-IR overexpression induces mammary tumors with basal-like characteristics, whereas IGF-IR-independent mammary tumors express a claudin-low gene signature

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 31, 期 27, 页码 3298-3309

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.486

关键词

IGF-IR; mammary tumor; DNA microarray; EMT; claudin

资金

  1. Cancer Research Society
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular profiling has allowed a more precise classification of human cancers. With respect to breast cancer, this approach has been used to identify five subtypes; luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, basal-like and claudin-low. In addition, this approach can be used to determine the type of tumor represented by particular cell lines or transgenic animal models. Therefore, this approach was utilized to classify the mammary tumors that develop in MTB-IGFIR transgenic mice. It was determined that the primary mammary tumors, which develop due to elevated expression of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR) in mammary epithelial cells, most closely resemble murine tumors with basal-like or mixed gene expression profiles and with human basal-like breast cancers. Downregulation of IGF-IR transgene in MTB-IGFIR tumor-bearing mice leads to the regression of most of the tumors, followed by tumor reappearance in some of the mice. These tumors that reappear following IGF-IR transgene downregulation do not express the IGF-IR transgene and cluster with murine mammary tumors that express a mesenchymal gene expression profile and with human claudin-low breast cancers. Therefore, IGF-IR overexpression in murine mammary epithelial cells induces mammary tumors with primarily basal-like characteristics, whereas tumors that develop following IGF-IR downregulation express a gene signature that most closely resembles human claudin-low breast tumors. Oncogene (2012) 31, 3298-3309; doi:10.1038/onc.2011.486; published online 24 October 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据