4.8 Article

Control of mammary tumor differentiation by SKI-606 (bosutinib)

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 301-312

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2010.412

关键词

Src; SKI-606; mouse; breast cancer; Ezh2

资金

  1. Pfizer Research
  2. NCI Cancer Center [2 P30 CA030199, R01 CA125255]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA030199, R01CA125255] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

C-Src is infrequently mutated in human cancers but it mediates oncogenic signals of many activated growth factor receptors and thus remains a key target for cancer therapy. However, the broad function of Src in many cell types and processes requires evaluation of Src-targeted therapeutics within a normal developmental and immune-competent environment. In an effort to understand the appropriate clinical use of Src inhibitors, we tested an Src inhibitor, SKI-606 (bosutinib), in the MMTV-PyVmT transgenic mouse model of breast cancer. Tumor formation in this model is dependent on the presence of Src, but the necessity of Src kinase activity for tumor formation has not been determined. Furthermore, Src inhibitors have not been examined in an autochthonous tumor model that permits assessment of effects on different stages of tumor progression. Here we show that oral administration of SKI-606 inhibited the phosphorylation of Src in mammary tumors and caused a rapid decrease in the Ezh2 Polycomb group histone H3K27 methyltransferase and an increase in epithelial organization. SKI-606 prevented the appearance of palpable tumors in over 50% of the animals and stopped tumor growth in older animals with pre-existing tumors. These antitumor effects were accompanied by decreased cellular proliferation, altered tumor blood vessel organization and dramatically increased differentiation to lactational and epidermal cell fates. SKI-606 controls the development of mammary tumors by inducing differentiation. Oncogene (2011) 30, 301-312; doi:10.1038/onc.2010.412; published online 6 September 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据