4.8 Article

Efficient in vivo microRNA targeting of liver metastasis

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 1481-1488

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2010.523

关键词

microRNA; melanoma; metastasis; liver; miR-182

资金

  1. ConCerN foundation
  2. Harry Lloyd Charitable Trust
  3. NYU
  4. National Cancer Center
  5. NIH [T32 CA09454-19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Targeting oncogenic microRNAs ( miRNAs) is emerging as a promising strategy for cancer therapy. In this study, we provide proof of principle for the safety and efficacy of miRNA targeting against metastatic tumors. We tested the impact of targeting miR-182, a pro-metastatic miRNA frequently overexpressed in melanoma, the in vitro silencing of which represses invasion and induces apoptosis. Specifically, we assessed the effect of anti-miR-182 oligo-nucleotides synthesized with 20 sugar modifications and a phosphorothioate backbone in a mouse model of melanoma liver metastasis. Luciferase imaging showed that mice treated with anti-miR-182 had a lower burden of liver metastases compared with control. We confirmed that miR-182 levels were effectively downregulated in the tumors of anti-miR-treated mice compared with tumors of control-treated mice, both in the liver and in the spleen. This effect was accompanied by an upregulation of multiple miR-182 direct targets. Transcriptional profiling of tumors treated with anti-miR-182 or with control oligo-nucleotides revealed an enrichment of genes controlling survival, adhesion and migration modulated in response to anti-miR-182 treatment. These data indicate that in vivo administration of anti-miRs allows for efficient miRNA targeting and concomitant upregulation of miRNA-controlled genes. Our results demonstrate that the use of anti-miR-182 is a promising therapeutic strategy for metastatic melanoma and provide a solid basis for testing similar strategies in human metastatic tumors. Oncogene (2011) 30, 1481-1488; doi:10.1038/onc.2010.523; published online 22 November 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据