4.8 Article

Counterbalance between RB inactivation and miR-17-92 overexpression in reactive oxygen species and DNA damage induction in lung cancers

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 28, 期 38, 页码 3371-3379

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.201

关键词

small-cell lung cancer; DNA damage response; miRNA; RB; reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund [07-23903]
  4. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive disease that exhibits rapid growth and genetic instability. We found earlier frequent overexpression of the miR-17-92 microRNA cluster, and showed that SCLC cells were addicted to continued expressions of miR-17-5p and miR-20a, major components of this microRNA cluster. In this study, we identified the frequent presence of constitutively phosphorylated H2AX (gamma-H2AX), which reflects continuing DNA damage, preferentially in SCLC. Knockdown of RB induced gamma-H2AX foci formation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells with wild-type RB, in association with growth inhibition and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which was canceled by overexpression of miR-17-92. Conversely, induction of gamma-H2AX was observed in a miR-17-92-overexpressing SCLC cell line with miR-20a antisense oligonucleotides. These findings suggest that miR-17-92 overexpression may serve as a fine-tuning influence to counterbalance the generation of DNA damage in RB-inactivated SCLC cells, thus reducing excessive DNA damage to a tolerable level and consequently leading to genetic instability. Therefore, miR-17-92 may be an excellent therapeutic target candidate to elicit excessive DNA damage in combination with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics. Oncogene (2009) 28, 3371-3379; doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.201; published online 13 July 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据