4.8 Article

Regulation by phosphorylation of the relative affinities of the N-terminal transactivation domains of p53 for p300 domains and Mdm2

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 28, 期 20, 页码 2112-2118

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.71

关键词

CBP; IHD; Mdm4; fluorescence anisotropy; phospho-peptides; transactivation

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U105474168] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [MC_U105474168] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U105474168, U.1054.00.012(74168)] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transcriptional activity of the tumour suppressor, p53, requires direct binding between its transactivation domain (TAD, 1-57) and the transcriptional coactivator, p300. We systematically assessed the role of TAD phosphorylation on binding of the p300 domains CH3, Taz1, Kix and IBiD. Thr18 phosphorylation increased the affinity up to sevenfold for CH3 and Taz1, with smaller increases from phosphorylation of Ser20, Ser15, Ser37, Ser33, Ser46 and Thr55. Binding of Kix and IBiD was less sensitive to phosphorylation. Strikingly, hepta-phosphorylation of all Ser and Thr residues increased binding 40- and 80-fold with CH3 and Taz1, respectively, but not with Kix or IBiD. Substitution of all phospho-sites with aspartates partially mimicked the effects of hepta-phosphorylation. Mdm2, the main negative regulator of p53, competes with p300 for binding to TAD. Binding of Mdm2 to TAD was reduced significantly only on phosphorylation of Thr18 (sevenfold) or by hepta-phosphorylation (24-fold). The relative affinities of Mdm2 and p300 for p53 TAD can thus be changed by up to three orders of magnitude by phosphorylation. Accordingly, phosphorylation of Thr18 and hepta-phosphorylation dramatically shifts the balance towards favouring the binding of p300 with p53, and is thus likely to be an important factor in its regulation. Oncogene (2009) 28, 2112-2118; doi:10.1038/onc.2009.71; published online 13 April 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据