4.8 Article

Proteasome inhibitors activate autophagy as a cytoprotective response in human prostate cancer cells

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 451-462

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.343

关键词

bortezomib; NPI-0052; autophagy; unfolded protein response; prostate cancer

资金

  1. Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program [PC050288]
  2. MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant [CA16672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ubiquitin-proteasome and lysosome-autophagy pathways are the two major intracellular protein degradation systems that work cooperatively to maintain homeostasis. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) have clinical activity in hematological tumors, and inhibitors of autophagy are also being evaluated as potential antitumor therapies. In this study, we found that chemical PIs and small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of the proteasome's enzymatic subunits promoted autophagosome formation, stimulated autophagic flux, and upregulated expression of the autophagy-specific genes (ATGs) (ATG5 and ATG7) in some human prostate cancer cells and immortalized mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Upregulation of ATG5 and ATG7 only occurred in cells displaying PI-induced phosphorylation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2 alpha), an important component of the unfolded protein responses. Furthermore, PIs did not induce autophagy or upregulate ATG5 in MEFs expressing a phosphorylation-deficient mutant form of eIF2 alpha. Combined inhibition of autophagy and the proteasome induced an accumulation of intracellular protein aggregates reminiscent of neuronal inclusion bodies and caused more cancer cell death than blocking either degradation pathway alone. Overall, our data show that proteasome inhibition activates autophagy through a phospho-eIF2 alpha-dependent mechanism to eliminate protein aggregates and alleviate proteotoxic stress. Oncogene (2010) 29, 451-462; doi:10.1038/onc.2009.343; published online 2 November 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据