4.8 Article

Suppression of breast cancer cell growth by a monoclonal antibody targeting cleavable ErbB4 isoforms

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 1309-1319

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.481

关键词

ectodomain shedding; EGFR; HER4; neuregulins; therapeutic antibodies

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Finnish Cancer Organizations
  3. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  4. Foundation for the Finnish Cancer Institute
  5. Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation
  6. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  7. Turku University Central Hospital
  8. Research and Science Foundation of Farmos

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ErbB4 isoforms mediate different cellular activities depending on their susceptibility to proteolytic cleavage. The biological significance of ErbB4 cleavage in tumorigenesis, however, remains poorly understood. Here, we describe characterization of a monoclonal antibody (mAb 1479) that selectively recognizes the ectodomain of cleavable ErbB4 JM-a isoforms both in vitro and in vivo. mAb 1479 was used to analyse ErbB4 JM-a expression and ectodomain shedding in a series of 17 matched breast cancer/histologically normal peripheral breast tissue pairs. ErbB4 ectodomain was observed in 75% of tumors expressing ErbB4 but only in 18% of normal breast tissue samples expressing ErbB4. Difference in the relative quantity of ErbB4 ectodomain between normal and tumor tissue pairs was statistically significant (P=0.015). Treatment with mAb 1479 suppressed ErbB4 function by inhibiting ErbB4 tyrosine phosphorylation and ectodomain shedding, and by stimulating ErbB4 downregulation and ubiquitination. mAb 1479 suppressed both anchorage-dependent and -independent growth of human breast cancer cell lines that naturally express cleavable ErbB4 JM-a. These findings indicate that ErbB4 ectodomain shedding is enhanced in breast cancer tissue in vivo, and that mAb 1479 represents a potential drug candidate that suppresses breast cancer cell growth by selectively binding cleavable ErbB4 isoforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据