4.8 Article

Src family tyrosine kinases-driven colon cancer cell invasion is induced by Csk membrane delocalization

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 1303-1315

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.450

关键词

tyrosine kinase Src; oncogenic signalling; colorectal cancer; invasion; Csk

资金

  1. Servier Laboratories
  2. la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer
  3. CNRS
  4. University of Montpellier 1 and 2
  5. l'Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC)
  6. INCa
  7. [4025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nonreceptor tyrosine kinases of the Src family (SFK) are frequently deregulated in human colorectal cancer (CRC), and they have been implicated in tumour growth and metastasis. How SFK are activated in this cancer has not been clearly established. Here, we show that the SFK-dependent invasion is induced by inactivation of the negative regulator C-terminal Src kinase, Csk. While the level of Csk was inconsistent with SFK activity in colon cancer cells, its membrane translocation, needed for efficient regulation of membrane-localized SFK activity, was impaired. Accordingly, Csk downregulation did not affect SFK oncogenic activity in these cells, whereas expression of a membrane-localized form of this kinase affected their invasive activity. Downregulation of the transmembrane and rafts-localized Csk-binding protein/phosphoprotein associated with glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomain (PAG), was instrumental for the cytoplasmic accumulation of Csk. Re-expression of PAG in cells from late-stage CRC inhibited SFK invasive activity in a Csk-dependent manner. Conversely, inactivation of its residual expression in early-stage CRC cells promoted SFK invasive activity. Finally, this mechanism was specific to CRC as Csk coupling to SFK was readily detected in breast cancer cells. Therefore, Csk mis-localization defines a novel mechanism for SFK oncogenic activation in CRC cells. Oncogene (2010) 29, 1303-1315; doi:10.1038/onc.2009.450; published online 14 December 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据