4.8 Review

Lysosomal membrane permeabilization in cell death

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 27, 期 50, 页码 6434-6451

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.310

关键词

lysosomal membrane permeabilization; cathepsins; programmed cell death; apoptosis; autophagy

资金

  1. Ministry of Science [BFU-2006-00508]
  2. Fundacion La Caixa [BM06-125-1]
  3. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipe labellisee)
  4. European Commission
  5. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche
  6. Institut National contre le Cancer
  7. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  8. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization ( MOMP) constitutes one of the major checkpoint(s) of apoptotic and necrotic cell death. Recently, the permeabilization of yet another organelle, the lysosome, has been shown to initiate a cell death pathway, in specific circumstances. Lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) causes the release of cathepsins and other hydrolases from the lysosomal lumen to the cytosol. LMP is induced by a plethora of distinct stimuli including reactive oxygen species, lysosomotropic compounds with detergent activity, as well as some endogenous cell death effectors such as Bax. LMP is a potentially lethal event because the ectopic presence of lysosomal proteases in the cytosol causes digestion of vital proteins and the activation of additional hydrolases including caspases. This latter process is usually mediated indirectly, through a cascade in which LMP causes the proteolytic activation of Bid (which is cleaved by the two lysosomal cathepsins B and D), which then induces MOMP, resulting in cytochrome c release and apoptosome-dependent caspase activation. However, massive LMP often results in cell death without caspase activation; this cell death may adopt a subapoptotic or necrotic appearance. The regulation of LMP is perturbed in cancer cells, suggesting that specific strategies for LMP induction might lead to novel therapeutic avenues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据