4.8 Article

Mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab: role of HER (ErbB) family members

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 27, 期 28, 页码 3944-3956

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.19

关键词

EGFR; cetuximab; acquired resistance

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA113448] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 113448-01, R01 CA113448, R01 CA113448-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) is a central regulator of proliferation and progression in human cancers. Five EGFR inhibitors, two monoclonal antibodies and three TKIs, have recently gained FDA approval in oncology ( cetuximab, panitumumab, erlotinib, gefitinib and lapatinib). These strategies of EGFR inhibition demonstrate major tumor regressions in approximately 10-20% of advanced cancer patients. However, many tumors eventually manifest acquired resistance to treatment. In this study we established and characterized a model to study molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab. Using high-throughput screening we examined the activity of 42 receptor tyrosine kinases in resistant tumor cells following chronic exposure to cetuximab. Cells developing acquired resistance to cetuximab exhibited increased steady-state EGFR expression secondary to alterations in trafficking and degradation. In addition, cetuximab-resistant cells manifested strong activation of HER2, HER3 and cMET. EGFR upregulation promoted increased dimerization with HER2 and HER3 leading to their transactivation. Blockade of EGFR and HER2 led to loss of HER3 and PI( 3) K/Akt activity. These data suggest that acquired resistance to cetuximab is accompanied by dysregulation of EGFR internalization/degradation and subsequent EGFR-dependent activation of HER3. Taken together these findings suggest a rationale for the clinical evaluation of combinatorial anti-HER targeting approaches in tumors manifesting acquired resistance to cetuximab.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据