4.3 Review

Application of Machine Learning to Proteomics Data: Classification and Biomarker Identification in Postgenomics Biology

期刊

OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 595-610

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2013.0017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/F017014/1]
  2. WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition
  3. European Union [305815]
  4. BBSRC [BB/F017014/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/K00414X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/K00414X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mass spectrometry is an analytical technique for the characterization of biological samples and is increasingly used in omics studies because of its targeted, nontargeted, and high throughput abilities. However, due to the large datasets generated, it requires informatics approaches such as machine learning techniques to analyze and interpret relevant data. Machine learning can be applied to MS-derived proteomics data in two ways. First, directly to mass spectral peaks and second, to proteins identified by sequence database searching, although relative protein quantification is required for the latter. Machine learning has been applied to mass spectrometry data from different biological disciplines, particularly for various cancers. The aims of such investigations have been to identify biomarkers and to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of specific diseases. This review describes how machine learning has been applied to proteomics tandem mass spectrometry data. This includes how it can be used to identify proteins suitable for use as biomarkers of disease and for classification of samples into disease or treatment groups, which may be applicable for diagnostics. It also includes the challenges faced by such investigations, such as prediction of proteins present, protein quantification, planning for the use of machine learning, and small sample sizes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据