4.3 Article

Albumin Overload Induces Apoptosis in Renal Tubular Epithelial Cells through a CHOP-Dependent Pathway

期刊

OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 61-73

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2009.0073

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30370534, 30771002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proteinuria-induced apoptosis of proximal tubular cells (PTCs) plays a crucial role in renal tubulointerstitial injury in chronic kidney disease. Recent studies have shown that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is involved in proteinuria-induced apoptosis of PTCs. Our study showed that albumin overload led to ER stress, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-homologous protein (CHOP), and PKR-like kinase (PERK) activation and to apoptosis of PTCs in proteinuria patients. The apoptotic index of proximal renal tubular cells in the nephrotic kidneys was about 13-fold higher than that in control kidneys. The increased tubular expression of GRP78, ORP150, and CHOP and nuclear localization of CHOP in nephrotic kidneys were also detected. The expression of GRP78, CHOP, PERK, and phosphorylated PERK increased proportionately with HSA overload in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Knockdown of CHOP by siRNA significantly reduced the HSA-induced apoptosis of HKC. The expression of PERK did not significantly change, but the phosphorylation of PERK increased. Furthermore, knockdown of PERK significantly inhibited HSA-induced CHOP expression, suppressing apoptosis in HKCs by 2.48-fold compared to controls. Overexpression of CHOP enhanced the apoptosis of HKC induced by albumin, no significant difference was observed in the expression of PERK, whereas the phosphorylation of PERK decreased. Our data indicated that proteinuria induces ER stress in renal tubular cells, which may subsequently lead to tubular damage through a PERK-CHOP-dependent pathway. This ER stress-induced apoptosis pathway may contribute to renal tubulointerstitial injury by proteinuria in chronic kidney disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据