3.9 Article

Pharmacokinetic analysis of polyamide nucleic-acid-cell penetrating peptide conjugates targeted against HIV-1 transactivation response element

期刊

OLIGONUCLEOTIDES
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 277-286

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/oli.2008.0140

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID/NIH [AI42520]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have demonstrated that polyamide nucleic acids complementary to the transactivation response (TAR) element of HIV-1 LTR inhibit HIV-1 production when transfected in HIV-1 infected cells. We have further shown that anti-TAR PNA (PNA(TAR)) conjugated with cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) is rapidly taken up by cells and exhibits strong antiviral and anti-HIV-1 virucidal activities. Here, we pharmacokinetically analyzed I-125-labeled PNA(TAR) conjugated with two CPPs: a 16-mer penetratin derived from antennapedia and a 13-mer Tat peptide derived from HIV-1 Tat. We administered the I-125-labeled PNA(TAR)-CPP conjugates to male Balb/C mice through intraperitoneal or gavage routes. The naked I-125-labeled PNA(TAR) was used as a control. Following a single administration of the labeled compounds, their distribution and retention in various organs were monitored at various time points. Regardless of the administration route, a significant accumulation of each PNA(TAR)-CPP conjugate was found in different mouse organs and tissues. The clearance profile of the accumulated radioactivity from different organs displayed a biphasic exponential pathway whereby part of the radioactivity cleared rapidly, but a significant portion of it was slowly released over a prolonged period. The kinetics of clearance of individual PNA(TAR)-CPP conjugates slightly varied in different organs, while the overall biphasic clearance pattern remained unaltered regardless of the administration route. Surprisingly, unconjugated naked PNA(TAR) displayed a similar distribution and clearance profile in most organs studied although extent of its uptake was lower than the PNA(TAR)-CPP conjugates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据