4.5 Article

El Nino-Southern Oscillation cyclical modulation of macrobenthic community structure in the Humboldt Current ecosystem

期刊

OIKOS
卷 121, 期 12, 页码 2097-2109

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20257.x

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. FONDECYT [3100085, 11100256]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how natural communities confront different types of natural and anthropogenic stressors has gained much more attention as global climate change imposes nearly unpredictable ecosystem states or regimes. In the Humboldt Current ecosystem this seems to be a priority task due to the complex dynamics caused by the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Herein a 17-year (1991-2007) time-series data-set of macrobenthic community structure and environmental parameters from seasonal sampling from four fixed stations off Punta Coloso (23 degrees 45S, 70 degrees 28W northern of Chile) is analyzed. The aim of this study was to assess benthic responses to ENSO-associated anomalies. nMDS analysis revealed changes in community structure associated to El Nino (1997-1998) and La Nina (1999-2000). From 1991, communities gradually increased in dissimilarity up to 1998 but after 2000 dissimilarity decreased, thus approaching the early community structure in a counterclockwise like direction. This suggested a cyclical pattern throughout time, which was tested with a cyclicity analysis. The test showed a significant correlation between the dissimilarity biotic matrix and a perfect cyclicity model matrix. The finding of a 17-year cycle in the variation of community structure adds new insights and contrast to previous observations of increments in diversity and alternation of dominant taxa associated to environmental forcing. It needs to be revealed if this cycle forms part of a major decadal oscillation in the benthic subsystem. Nevertheless, this result is in line with the decadal pattern of variability observed for pelagic communities associated to warm and cold phases of ENSO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据