4.5 Article

Physiological energetics and biogeographic range limits of three congeneric mussel species

期刊

OECOLOGIA
卷 172, 期 1, 页码 35-46

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2486-6

关键词

Biogeography; Energetics; Scope for growth; Mytilus; Blue mussel

类别

资金

  1. NASA [NNG04GE43G, NNX07AF20G, NNX11AP77]
  2. NOAA [NA04NOS4780264]
  3. NSF [OCE1039513, OCE1129401]
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1129401] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Closely related species with different physiological tolerances and distributions make ideal systems for documenting range shifts in response to a changing climate. Mytilus edulis, M. trossulus, and M. galloprovincialis are sibling species of marine mussels with distinct biogeographical ranges that are correlated with sea surface temperatures. We determined the scope for growth of these three species at a range of temperatures to determine if energetics could predict their distributions. Scope for growth (SFG) represents energy available for growth and/or reproduction above that necessary for maintenance requirements. The SFG of M. galloprovincialis, the species known to inhabit the warmest habitats, was shifted towards warmer temperatures compared to the other two species, remaining positive until nearly 30 A degrees C. M. edulis, a cold-temperate species, maintained a positive SFG up to 23 A degrees C. M. trossulus, a boreal species, generally was not able to maintain a positive SFG above 17 A degrees C. The warm end of each species' range correlated strongly with the point at which that species' SFG became negative in summer and fall. Energetics at cold temperatures did not predict the cold end of the species' ranges, as there was no clear SFG advantage to explain the dominance of M. trossulus in cold habitats. As sea surface temperatures continue to warm with climate change, the energetics of these three species provide a basis for developing mechanistic models predicting future distribution and productivity changes in mussel populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据