4.5 Article

Abiotic stress mediates top-down and bottom-up control in a Southwestern Atlantic salt marsh

期刊

OECOLOGIA
卷 163, 期 1, 页码 181-191

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1504-9

关键词

Herbivory; Neohelice granulata; Nutrients; Spartina densiflora; Tidal stress gradient

类别

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
  2. Fundacion Antorchas [13900-13]
  3. ANPCyT
  4. CONICET
  5. Andrew Mellon Foundation
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1030822] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence has shown that nutrients and consumers interact to control primary productivity in natural systems, but how abiotic stress affects this interaction is unclear. Moreover, while herbivores can strongly impact zonation patterns in a variety of systems, there are few examples of this in salt marshes. We evaluated the effect of nutrients and herbivores on the productivity and distribution of the cordgrass Spartina densiflora along an intertidal stress gradient, in a Southwestern Atlantic salt marsh. We characterized abiotic stresses (salinity, ammonium concentration, and anoxia) and manipulated nutrients and the presence of the herbivorous crab Neohelice (Chasmagnathus) granulata, at different tidal heights with a factorial experiment. Abiotic stress increased at both ends of the tidal gradient. Salinity and anoxia were highest at the upper and lower edge of the intertidal, respectively. Nutrients and herbivory interacted to control cordgrass biomass, but their relative importance varied with environmental context. Herbivory increased at lower tidal heights to the point that cordgrass transplants onto bare mud substrate were entirely consumed unless crabs were excluded, while nutrients were most important where abiotic stress was reduced. Our results show how the impact of herbivores and nutrients on plant productivity can be dependent on environmental conditions and that the lower intertidal limits of marsh plants can be controlled by herbivory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据