4.5 Article

Nuclear Factor-κB: Central Regulator in Ocular Surface Inflammation and Diseases

期刊

OCULAR SURFACE
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 137-148

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2012.04.001

关键词

angiogenesis; apoptosis; inflammation; NF-kappa B; signal transduction; transcription factors; wound healing

资金

  1. National Medical Research Council [NMRC/TCR/002-SERI/2008, NMRC/1206/2009, NMRC/CSA/013/2009]
  2. Singhealth Foundation [SHF/FG325S/2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) is a key transcription factor pathway that is responsible for many key biological processes, such as inflammation, apoptosis, stress response, corneal wound healing, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis. Numerous recent studies have investigated NF-kappa B in the context of ocular surface disorders, including chemical injury, ultraviolet radiation-induced injury, microbial infections, allergic eye diseases, dry eye, pterygium, and corneal graft rejection. The purpose this article is to summarize key findings with regard to the pathways regulating NF-kappa B and processes governed by the NF-kappa B pathway. In the innate defense system, NF-kappa B is involved in signaling from the toll-like receptors 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7, which are expressed in conjunctival, limbal, and corneal epithelial cells. These determine the ocular responses to infections, such as those caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, adenovirus, and herpes simplex-1 virus. Natural angiogenic inhibitors enhance NF-kappa B, and this may occur through the mitogen-activated protein kinases and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. In alkali injury, inhibition of NF-kappa B can reduce corneal angiogenesis, suggesting a possible therapeutic strategy. The evaluation of NF-kappa B inhibitors in diseases is also discussed, including emodin, besifloxacin, BOL-303242-X (mapracorat), thymosin-beta 4, epigallocatechin gallate, Perilla frutescens leaf extract and IKK beta-targeting short interfering RNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据