4.3 Article

Comparative Analysis of Anterior Chamber Flare Grading between Clinicians with Different Levels of Experience and Semi-automated Laser Flare Photometry

期刊

OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 184-193

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/09273948.2014.990042

关键词

Anterior segment flare; Bland-Altman plot for intergrader correlation; grading of flare; intraocular inflammation; laser flare photometry

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  2. National Medical Research Council, Singapore
  3. Institute of Ophthalmology and Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
  4. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-SGCL6-Keane] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2010-18-004] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To assess correlation for anterior chamber flare grading between clinicians with different levels of experience and with semi -automated flare reading in a cohort of patients with heterogeneous uveitic entities. Methods: Fifty-nine observations from 36 patients were recorded and analyzed for statistical association. In each patient, flare was assessed objectively using the Kowa FM -700 laser flare photometer, and subjective masked grading by two clinicians was performed. Results: The study demonstrated disparity in flare readings between clinical graders with one step disagreement in clinical grading in 26 (44.06%) eyes (p < 0.001) and concordance between the flare readings by experienced grader and flare photometry. After review of semi -automated flare readings, management was changed in 11% of the patients. Conclusion: Laser flare photometry can be a valuable tool to remove the observer bias in grading flare for selected cohort of uveitis patients. It can be further applied to titrate therapy in intraocular inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据