4.3 Article

Anthropogenic radionuclides 137Cs and 90Sr in the southern Baltic Sea ecosystem

期刊

OCEANOLOGIA
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 485-517

出版社

POLISH ACAD SCIENCES INST OCEANOLOGY
DOI: 10.5697/oc.55-3.485

关键词

Cs-137; Sr-90; Southern Baltic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The radioisotopes of caesium (Cs-137) and strontium (Sr-90) make the greatest contribution to the radioactivity level due to artificial radionuclides in the Baltic Sea, where the level of Cs-137 contamination is higher than in any other part of the world ocean. The main sources of man-made radionuclides are the Chernobyl accident in 1986 and the nuclear weapons tests carried out in the 1950s and 1960s. This study discusses the distribution patterns and trends in activity concentrations of Cs-137 and Sr-90 recorded in various compartments of the marine environment of the southern Baltic Sea. It is based on an investigation of radioactive substances as part of the Polish National Environmental Monitoring Programme In 2010 the average concentration of Cs-137 in the southern Baltic was 35 Bq m(-3), while the level of 90Sr in these waters has remained at much the same level in recent years (ca 8 Bq m(-3)). The distribution of isotopes in the bottom sediments reflect historical events that can be identified in sediment profiles. The activity concentrations of the caesium isotope are the highest in sediments from the Gulf of Gdansk, whereas the least polluted sediments are found in the Bornholm Basin, in the western part of the southern Baltic. The highest concentrations of Cs-137 in benthic plants were measured in the red alga Polysiphonia fucoides: 22.3 Bq kg(-1) d.w. in June and 40.4 Bq kg(-1) in September. These levels were much higher than those found in the bivalve Mytilus trossulus (7.3 Bq kg(-1) d.w.). Cs-137 concentrations in fish have decreased in time, reflecting the trends recorded in seawater. In 2010 the respective Cs-137 activities in Clupea harengus, Platichthys flesus and Gadus morhua were 4.7, 4.9 and 6.6 Bq kg(-1) w.w.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据