4.6 Article

A sensitivity study of the sea ice simulation in the global coupled climate model, HadGEM3

期刊

OCEAN MODELLING
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 60-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.12.003

关键词

Sea ice; Modelling; Sensitivity; Coupling; Arctic; Antarctic

资金

  1. Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the results of a wide-ranging sea ice sensitivity study, performed with a fully-coupled global atmosphere-ice-ocean climate model. We investigate sensitivity to a selection of sea ice parameters, varied within the range of observational uncertainty, and additionally study the effect on the sea ice of increased resolution in the atmosphere and ocean-ice models, as well as dynamics and physics changes in the atmosphere. In the Arctic, we find that the sea ice thickness is most sensitive to the albedo of the overlying snow layer (because of its influence on surface melt) and the thermal conductivities of ice and snow (because of their role in regulating heat flux from the ocean to the atmosphere through the ice). We find the winter Arctic ice extent to be sensitive to the resolution of the ocean-ice model, through increased sea surface temperatures in the Labrador Sea at higher resolution. The Arctic ice extent is reduced under increased atmospheric resolution, because of increased poleward heat transport. In the Antarctic, the sensitivity to sea ice parameters is weaker, and atmosphere and ocean forcing dominate; in particular, increased resolution of the atmosphere and ocean-ice models leads to the enhancement of a warm bias in the Southern Ocean, which has a large impact on sea ice thickness and extent. Inclusion of a selection of these parameters in combination, together with changes to the atmosphere and ocean models, leads to significant improvements in representation of Arctic sea ice extent, thickness and volume in a new global coupled model configuration. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据