4.7 Article

Blade loads on tidal turbines in planar oscillatory flow

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 163-174

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.027

关键词

Tidal turbine; Unsteady hydrodynamics; Dynamic stall; Added mass; Rotor aerodynamics

资金

  1. Bright Futures Top Achiever Doctoral Scholarship
  2. UK EPSRC [EP/F062036/1]
  3. Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering at the University of Strathclyde
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F062036/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/F062036/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characterisation of the unsteady hydrodynamic loads is essential for accurate predictions of the fatigue life and ultimate loads of tidal turbine blades. This paper analyses a set of experimental tests of the hydrodynamic blade root out-of-plane bending moment response to planar oscillatory motion, chosen as an idealised representation of the unsteadiness imparted by waves and turbulence. Phenomena associated with dynamic stall are observed which are sensitive to the oscillatory frequency and velocity amplitude. Flow separation is shown to result in loads significantly greater in magnitude than that for steady flow. Following flow reattachment, the load cycles compare relatively well with Theodorsen's theory for a two-dimensional foil oscillating in heave, suggesting that circulation due to the shed wake dominates the unsteadiness in phase with acceleration, over added mass effects. For attached flow, the effect of unsteadiness is comparatively much smaller. At low frequencies a phase lead over the velocity is observed, compared to a lag at higher frequencies. Multiple frequency oscillations are also briefly considered. Reconstruction of the multi-frequency response using both the steady flow measurements, and the single frequency measured response, is shown to offer a relatively good fit when the flow is attached, for lower frequency combinations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据